Category: EdTech

Inquiry and Passion – Jeff Hopkins

Education as if people mattered (TEDx Talk)

“education is not the filling of a pail, but rather the lighting of a flame”

Jeff Hopkin’s TEDx talk spoke to me. I think that we are starting to move in the direction that he is suggesting. That inquiry and passion driven education model that he tries to use at PSII. Certainly this class is proof that at least some new teachers are learning these concepts. However, we have a long way to go.

I remember as a child learning content, specifically, I remember learning about railroads and the fur trade and finding it very boring. For years, social studies was my least favourite subject, all through high school. I went on to university and studied science and said good riddance to “social studies” because the way it had been taught to me was so dry. Then, slowly, I started getting involved with activism, social justice, eco-justice, decolonization, more and more of my classes were focused around social sciences and I found them more engaging than most science courses I was taking. My values had not changed, my previous experience had just not lit the flame.

The solution, as Jeff so clearly demonstrated in his searching for keys example, is difficult. Our systems are so set in place and while change is happening there are still many who like the old ways. The funding is supporting the old ways. Decades of resources support the old ways. In certain cases, retired teachers turned professors still have foot in the past. Do children need to learn math? Yes probably, do they need learn math the way we have been teaching for decades? Probably not seeing as so many children grow up hating math.

Inquiry is still tricky for me because I wasn’t taught in that way, given no boundaries, due dates, criteria etc. I flounder. I am glad we are getting some instruction on this subject because honestly, I wouldn’t have known where to start.

Thoughts on “Most Likely to Succeed”

“Most Likely to Succeed” had me spiralling between different emotions. When we were first introduced to High Tech High my initial reaction was “Well that’s the dream isn’t it?” I feel that most teachers would be ecstatic to be told that they can teach what they want and how they want. Quickly though, I began to have many of the same apprehensions that are voiced throughout the film.

I believe that yes, the premise of High Tech High is something that we should strive for and I do believe that it is the education that will create adults more prepared for the job market of the 21st century. However, as the students at the traditional high school, and parents, voiced, we aren’t there yet. So maybe we are at a transitionary place, which is an uncomfortable place to be.

I can so easily see myself in so many of the students that were featured. I was awkward and wanted to please people like Samantha. I had a tendency to be a perfectionist with too big ideas and a tendency to procrastinate like Bryan (still do). I was the girl stressing about her grades to get into university and preaching the gospel of the almighty importance of a letter grade. Though honestly Bryan impressed me the most, he failed to meet his deadline and at his age that would have completely crushed me to the point that I’d probably be having an anxiety attack. Now I’m not sure if his reaction is different because of his character or the values that have been enforced by the school, but I don’t know that I would have had the drive to stay for weeks after the exhibition to finish the project. I don’t know who I would be had I gone to High Tech High, but I have to believe that I would know what interests me and have a better sense of self and confidence.

I can also see myself in the math teacher trying to bring the new teaching style to the traditional public school. In my last job I would try to mix things up and introduce new projects or activities, but the kids were comfortable with what they knew, and as I was hired to give them stability, I tended to let them dictate the programming which ended up being repetitive. In a setting where my role was as a teacher and not as a youth worker, would I be able to stick to my guns and teach the way that I feel is best? Should a teacher not listen to what their students are saying? If a large portion of the class is saying “teach to the test” is teaching to the test not student focused and guided, even if you believe you know better?

Though my honest reaction? Thank god I’ll be teaching elementary or middle school in Canada and not high school in the United States because if I had to teach to the SATs, I’m not sure I would make it.